menu
Qammunity
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Which decision by the Warren Court determined that the state must provide a lawyer to a person accused of a crime who cannot afford one? A. Reynolds’s v. Sims B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Gideon v. Wainwright
asked
Jul 27, 2024
152k
views
3
votes
Which decision by the Warren Court determined that the state must provide a lawyer to a person accused of a crime who cannot afford one?
A. Reynolds’s v. Sims
B. Miranda v. Arizona
C. Gideon v. Wainwright
D. Mapp v. Ohio
History
high-school
Slava V
asked
by
Slava V
7.1k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
3
votes
The answer is C. The Supreme Court decided in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) that the Constitution mandates that states provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford to hire their own attorneys.
Adrian Pronk
answered
Aug 1, 2024
by
Adrian Pronk
8.3k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Feb 16, 2021
35.6k
views
In what landmark case did the Warren Court rule that an accused criminal had the right to a lawyer whether or not the person could afford one? A. Gideon v. Wainwright B. Reynolds v. Sims C. Miranda v.
Robbie Rosati
asked
Feb 16, 2021
by
Robbie Rosati
8.0k
points
History
high-school
1
answer
1
vote
35.6k
views
asked
Dec 7, 2021
136k
views
Which of these court cases MOST LIKELY helped accused people who cannot afford lawyers get them from the government? A) Roe v. Wade B) Miranda v. Arizona C) Gideon v. Wainwright D) Dred Scott v. Sandford
Osotorrio
asked
Dec 7, 2021
by
Osotorrio
8.6k
points
History
middle-school
2
answers
1
vote
136k
views
asked
May 12, 2017
98.0k
views
One criticism of the Warren Court’s decisions in Mapp v. Ohio (1961), Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) is that the Supreme Court (1) limited police powers while expanding the
Fruggiero
asked
May 12, 2017
by
Fruggiero
8.0k
points
History
high-school
2
answers
0
votes
98.0k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.4m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Why might things far away and long ago be important to us now.
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qammunity