The Golden State Killer case does not align neatly with a specific sociological theory, as it involves complex factors that can be analyzed from multiple perspectives. However, the case could be examined through the lens of social control theory or strain theory, which are commonly used in criminology and sociology to understand deviant behavior.
1. Social Control Theory: This theory emphasizes the role of social bonds and the absence of strong social controls in explaining criminal behavior. The Golden State Killer, Joseph James DeAngelo, was able to elude capture for decades, which could be attributed to weak social controls, such as a lack of surveillance or community cohesion.
2. Strain Theory: This theory posits that individuals may turn to deviant behavior when they experience strain or frustration due to the discrepancy between their aspirations and the means available to achieve them. In the case of the Golden State Killer, factors such as personal frustrations, failed relationships, or other life stressors could have contributed to DeAngelo's criminal acts.
It's important to note that other sociological theories, such as social disorganization theory, labeling theory, or rational choice theory, could also provide insights into aspects of the Golden State Killer case. The analysis may vary depending on the specific aspects of the case being examined, and multiple theories can be combined to provide a more comprehensive understanding.