98.4k views
3 votes
Percival is an avid fan of the British band The Style Council, and never misses any of their concerts when they come to town. The Style Council will be having a concert in Percival's hometown. Percival has decided to attend the concert irrespective of the cost. Using Nozick's entitlement theory of justice, which of the examples does not meet Nozick's notion of just acquisition and exchange? Percival asks his friend Thomas for a loan. Thomas gives Percival the money, knowing that he will never get his money back, because he knows that he can count on Percival to tutor him in chemistry. Percival takes money from his sleeping father's wallet to pay for the concert ticket. Percival goes into his savings in order to obtain the funds for the ticket. Percival, who knows that he does not have money for the concert, talks the concert promoter into letting him work as an usher at the performance hall for free. He feels that doing this is better than not being able to see his favorite band perform.

2 Answers

3 votes

According to Nozick's principles, the scenario where Percival takes money from his sleeping father's wallet without his consent does not meet the notion of just acquisition.

Percival asks his friend Thomas for a loan. Thomas gives Percival the money, knowing that he will never get his money back, because he knows that he can count on Percival to tutor him in chemistry. - This scenario involves a voluntary exchange between Percival and Thomas, where both parties agree to the terms. According to Nozick, voluntary transactions that result from just acquisition or transfer are permissible. Therefore, this scenario may meet Nozick's notion of justice.

Percival takes money from his sleeping father's wallet to pay for the concert ticket. - This scenario involves taking property without the owner's consent, and it does not adhere to the principles of just acquisition. Nozick's theory would likely find this action unjust.

Percival goes into his savings in order to obtain the funds for the ticket. - If Percival earned or acquired the savings justly, then using his own savings to purchase the ticket aligns with Nozick's principles of justice. Individuals are entitled to the fruits of their labor and justly acquired holdings.

Percival, who knows that he does not have money for the concert, talks the concert promoter into letting him work as an usher at the performance hall for free. He feels that doing this is better than not being able to see his favorite band perform. - This scenario involves a voluntary agreement between Percival and the concert promoter. If both parties willingly agree to the terms, and Percival is not coerced into the arrangement, it may be considered a just exchange, even though no money changes hands.

The scenario that does not meet Nozick's notion of just acquisition and exchange is the second one, where Percival takes money from his sleeping father's wallet without his father's consent. This action does not adhere to the principles of just acquisition.

User MrDrews
by
7.1k points
3 votes

The example that does not meet Nozick's notion of just acquisition and exchange is this: Percival taking money from his sleeping father's wallet to pay for the concert ticket.

Why the action does not meet the notion

This action of Percival taking money from his sleeping father's wallet to pay for the concert ticket does not meet Nozick's notion of just acquisition and exchange because Percival is not acquiring the money through his labor or a voluntary exchange with his father.

Instead, he is taking the money without his father's consent. This violates Nozick's principle of self-ownership, which states that individuals have the right to their own person and property.

User Laurette
by
7.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.