Final answer:
In the provided scenarios, the recommended audit reports vary from unmodified opinion to qualified, adverse, or disclaimer of opinion, depending on issues such as omission of material events, scope limitation, or the sufficiency of audit evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Appropriate Audit Reports for Independent Situations
For the situation involving the fire damage to the client's plant that was not disclosed in the financial statements or footnotes, the appropriate audit report would be a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion, depending on the materiality of the information omitted. A qualified opinion indicates that, except for the effects of the issue noted, the financial statements present a true and fair view. If the issue is materially misstated, an adverse opinion is needed because the financial statements do not present a true and fair view.
In the scenario where the auditor is refused permission to inspect the minutes of board meetings, this limitation of scope would require the auditor to issue either a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, again depending on the potential impact of this limitation on the ability to form an opinion on the financial statements.
For the situation where cash receipts could not be counted but were verified through an alternative auditing procedure that the CPA found satisfactory, the audit report can be unmodified as the auditor was able to gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the cutoff of cash receipts.
In the final case of the Retail Auto Parts Company's inventory revaluation due to a price increase by their supplier, if the revaluation is material but does not distort the view provided by the financial statements and is adequately disclosed, the auditor may issue an unmodified opinion with an emphasis of matter paragraph highlighting the footnote disclosure.