The statement that "the argument from design, observes nature, and concludes that it demonstrates randomness rather than intentionality or a plan" is False.
What is the nature of the argument?
The argument does not point to randomness but the opposite of this which is intentionality so we can conclude that the statement is false. A logical argument gives a reason as to why a conclusion is true. This sort of argument is based on statistics and facts and not mere emotions.
So, the observation about nature is that there is intentionality in the way things are made and they do not come about by mere chance.