Question

3.1. Give an example for each one of conservative and progressive approaches in the context of hermeneutics for the following source: (8) "Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, "Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh? So, they are no longer two but one flesh. What, therefore, God has joined together, let not man separate?" (Matthew 19:4-6) ​

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of hermeneutics, conservative and progressive approaches can lead to different interpretations of the same source text. Here's an example of how each approach might interpret the given passage:

Conservative Approach:

A conservative approach to hermeneutics often emphasizes traditional interpretations and seeks to uphold established beliefs and values. In the case of the given source passage from Matthew 19:4-6, a conservative interpretation might focus on maintaining the traditional understanding of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. The emphasis would be on the permanence and sacredness of the marital bond, as expressed in the phrase "What, therefore, God has joined together, let not man separate." This approach may prioritize preserving the traditional teachings and values derived from the text.

Progressive Approach:

A progressive approach to hermeneutics often seeks to reinterpret and reevaluate traditional interpretations, taking into account contemporary understandings, cultural shifts, and social contexts. In the case of the given source passage, a progressive interpretation might focus on the broader principles of love, equality, and commitment found in the text rather than emphasizing a specific gendered understanding of marriage. This approach may highlight the value of inclusivity and consider other forms of relationships and family structures that may not align with the traditional understanding. It might also consider the historical and cultural context of the passage and the evolving understandings of gender and relationships.

It's important to note that interpretations can vary within each approach, and these examples are just one way of illustrating the differences between conservative and progressive hermeneutical approaches in the context of the given source text.

Answer 2

Here are some examples of conservative and progressive approaches to hermeneutics in the context of the passage from Matthew 19:4-6:

Conservative approach:

• A conservative approach to hermeneutics would focus on the literal meaning of the passage. This approach would argue that the passage clearly teaches that marriage is between one man and one woman.
• A conservative approach would also likely argue that the passage is timeless and applies to all people, regardless of their culture or context.

Progressive approach:

• A progressive approach to hermeneutics would focus on the historical and cultural context of the passage. This approach would argue that the passage was written in a time and place when women were seen as inferior to men.
• A progressive approach would also likely argue that the passage should be interpreted in light of modern values, such as equality and respect for all people.

It is important to note that these are just two examples of how the passage from Matthew 19:4-6 could be interpreted using a conservative or progressive approach to hermeneutics. There are many other possible interpretations, and the best approach will vary depending on the individual's beliefs and values.

Here are some additional thoughts on the conservative and progressive approaches to hermeneutics:

Conservative approach:

• A conservative approach to hermeneutics is often seen as being more literal and objective.
• This approach is often used by people who believe that the Bible is the literal word of God.
• A conservative approach can be helpful for people who want to understand the original meaning of the Bible.

Progressive approach:

• A progressive approach to hermeneutics is often seen as being more open-ended and subjective.
• This approach is often used by people who believe that the Bible is a product of its time and place.
• A progressive approach can be helpful for people who want to understand the Bible in light of modern values.

Ultimately, the best approach to hermeneutics is the one that helps you to understand the Bible in a way that is meaningful to you.