Answer: Government can provide services that would not be practical for private businesses to provide, such as a national military.
One benefit of the government providing services instead of allowing the free market and private businesses to do so is that the government can provide services that would not be practical for private businesses to provide, such as a national military. While private businesses play a crucial role in the economy and provide various goods and services, certain services that require large-scale coordination, public safety, or national security may not be feasible or efficient for private entities to undertake.
For example, a national military is responsible for defending the country and protecting its citizens. The resources and capabilities required for maintaining a military force, including personnel, equipment, intelligence gathering, and strategic planning, are typically beyond the scope and capacity of private businesses. The government can allocate the necessary resources and coordinate the defense efforts on a national scale, ensuring the security and stability of the country.
Additionally, there are services that have a public interest or social welfare component, which may not align with the profit motives of private businesses. These services often require government intervention to ensure equitable access and fair distribution, such as public education, healthcare, infrastructure development, and social welfare programs.
It is important to note that the division between government and private sector involvement in providing services can vary depending on the country and its specific political and economic systems. The optimal balance between government and private sector involvement is a subject of ongoing debate and varies across different sectors and industries.