Answer:
In the story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, both Rainsford and Zaroff engage in a deadly game of cat and mouse. While there are no explicitly stated rules for the game, we can analyze their actions and behaviors to determine if they follow any implied rules or principles.
1. Zaroff's Rules:
Zaroff, as the hunter, sets the parameters for the game. He has a set of rules that he follows:
a) The prey, in this case, Rainsford, is given a head start before the hunt begins. This allows Rainsford a chance to escape and adds an element of challenge to the game.
b) Zaroff hunts his prey only on his private island, Ship-Trap Island. This implies that the game is confined to a specific location, and Zaroff does not hunt people elsewhere.
c) Zaroff uses a variety of weapons and techniques during the hunt, showcasing his prowess as a skilled hunter. However, he gives Rainsford the opportunity to choose his weapon, creating a sense of fairness.
2. Rainsford's Actions:
Rainsford, as the hunted, is forced to adapt to the dangerous situation. While he doesn't explicitly establish any rules, his actions suggest a set of principles he follows:
a) Rainsford uses his survival skills and knowledge of hunting to outwit Zaroff and evade capture. He employs various strategies, such as creating traps and misleading his pursuer, in an attempt to level the playing field.
b) Rainsford aims to survive the ordeal and escape from the island. His focus is primarily on self-preservation and finding a way to overcome Zaroff's challenge.
It's important to note that both Rainsford and Zaroff participate in the deadly game voluntarily. However, the ethical implications of their actions are open to interpretation. While Zaroff views hunting humans as a thrilling sport, Rainsford's actions can be seen as self-defense and survival instincts.
In summary, although there are no explicitly defined rules for the game, Zaroff sets certain parameters and Rainsford adapts his strategies to survive. Their actions reflect their roles as hunter and hunted, but the moral implications of their actions are subject to personal interpretation.
Step-by-step explanation: