Final answer:
a. To test whether x₁ is significant at a = 0.05, calculate the F-statistic and compare it to the critical value. Reject the null hypothesis if the calculated F-value is greater than the critical value. b. To test whether x2 and x3 contribute significantly to the model at a = 0.05, calculate the F-statistic and compare it to the critical value. Reject the null hypothesis if the calculated F-value is greater than the critical value.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. To test whether x₁ is significant at a = 0.05, we can calculate the F-statistic using the formula F = (SSR / k) / (SSE / (n - k - 1)).
Here, SSR = SST - SSE = 1550 - 520 = 1030, k = 1 (number of regressors), SSE = 520, and n = 27 (number of observations).
Plugging in these values, we get F = (1030 / 1) / (520 / (27 - 1 - 1)) = 49.52.
Next, we can compare this value to the critical value from the F-distribution table with (k, n - k - 1) degrees of freedom. At a = 0.05, the critical value is 4.24 for (1, 25) degrees of freedom.
Since the calculated F-value of 49.52 is greater than the critical value of 4.24, we reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, x₁ is significant.
b. To test whether x2 and x3 contribute significantly to the model at a = 0.05, we can calculate the F-statistic using the formula F = ((SSE₁ - SSE₂) / (k₂ - k₁)) / (SSE₂ / (n - k₂ - 1)).
Here, SSE₁ = 520, SSE₂ = 100, k₁ = 1 (number of regressors in the initial model), k₂ = 3 (number of regressors in the new model), and n = 27 (number of observations).
Plugging in these values, we get F = ((520 - 100) / (3 - 1)) / (100 / (27 - 3 - 1)) = 48.3.
Next, we can compare this value to the critical value from the F-distribution table with ((k₂ - k₁), (n - k₂ - 1)) degrees of freedom. At a = 0.05, the critical value is 4.28 for (2, 23) degrees of freedom.
Since the calculated F-value of 48.3 is greater than the critical value of 4.28, we reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, x2 and x3 contribute significantly to the model.