Question

what was the supreme court decision in barron baltimore all citizens are entitled to substantice due proces

Answer 1

Barron v. Baltimore was a landmark decision that influenced U.S. constitutional law for almost a century. The Supreme Court reasoned that the framers of the Constitution did not intend the Bill of Rights to extend to state actions. In this case, John Barron sued the City of Baltimore for losses, arguing that he was deprived of his property without the due process afforded him by the Fifth Amendment. Barron was awarded $4,500 in compensation by the trial court, but a Maryland appellate court reversed the decision. The Supreme Court heard arguments on the case on February 8 and 11 and decided on February 16, 183312.

It is important to note that the Supreme Court has held in other cases that for a state to deny certain protections of the Bill of Rights would deny the liberty guaranteed to all persons against state action under the 14th Amendment’s due process clause3.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.

Learn more:

1. mtsu.edu

2. en.wikipedia.org

3. constitutioncenter.org

4. ballotpedia.org

+1 more

Like

Dislike

Copy

Export

Share

What is the Bill of Rights?

What is the Fifth Amendment?

What is the 14th Amendment?

Let’s chat

See more

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

Answer: The Supreme Court decision in Barron v. Baltimore was that the Fifth Amendment's protections against deprivation of property without due process of law applied only to the federal government and not to the states, so Baltimore was not required to give its citizens any substantial due process.

Step-by-step explanation: