Question

In the late 19th century, Giovanni Schiaparelli observed the planet Mars with a telescope. He detected lines across the surface of Mars, which he called

"channels." This word was translated into English as "canals." Then, the astronomer Percival Lowell drew maps depicting a fake Martian civilization. Later
observations with better telescopes showed that there are no canals on Mars. How was scientific knowledge of Mars open to change?
O A New evidence could also be interpreted as canals.
8. New evidence showed Martian civilization was possible.
OC. New evidence did not support the earlier interpretations of observations.
OD. New evidence was insufficient to confirm or deny the earlier observations.

Answer 1

oPtion C is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Scientific knowledge is open to change because it is based on the systematic and ongoing process of observation, experimentation, and analysis. As new evidence becomes available, scientists reassess their theories and hypotheses to align with the most accurate and current understanding of the subject.

In the case of Giovanni Schiaparelli's observations of Mars, his initial interpretation of the lines on the planet's surface as "channels" was later translated into English as "canals." Percival Lowell further popularized this idea by drawing maps depicting a fictional Martian civilization with a network of canals.

However, as technology improved and more detailed observations of Mars were made with better telescopes, it became clear that there were no actual canals on the planet. The new evidence did not support the earlier interpretations of observations, indicating that the existence of Martian canals was a misinterpretation or a product of human imagination.

This example demonstrates how scientific knowledge can evolve and change based on new evidence that challenges or contradicts previous ideas. It highlights the importance of critical evaluation, rigorous experimentation, and openness to revising theories in the face of new information.