Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the given information, the population of the U.S. between 1900 and 2000 experienced the following changes:
A. The greatest amount of growth took place in the Northwestern U.S.
B. There were fewer people in the Midwest in 2000 than there were in 1900.
C. The population became smaller in the Northeast but larger in the West.
D. The Northeast became more highly populated, and there was growth in other regions.
Analyzing these statements, we can conclude the following:
A. Accept. The statement suggests that the Northwestern U.S. experienced the greatest population growth between 1900 and 2000.
B. Reject. The statement claims that there were fewer people in the Midwest in 2000 compared to 1900. However, without specific data or the maps themselves, we cannot determine the accuracy of this statement.
C. Accept. According to the statement, the population decreased in the Northeast but increased in the West. This indicates a shift in population distribution from the Northeast to the Western regions.
D. Accept. The statement states that the Northeast became more densely populated while other regions also experienced growth. This implies a dual trend of population increase in the Northeast and growth in other parts of the country.
In summary, based on the provided statements, it can be accepted that the Northwestern U.S. experienced the greatest population growth, the population decreased in the Northeast but increased in the West, and there was growth in other regions. However, the accuracy of the claim regarding the population change in the Midwest cannot be determined without further information or access to the maps mentioned.