Answer:
A strong mayor-council form of government is a system where the mayor has extensive executive powers and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the city. The mayor has the power to veto city council decisions and control the budget of the city. This form of government typically has a city administrator or chief executive officer who reports to the mayor.
On the other hand, a weak mayor-council form of government is a system where the mayor does not have extensive executive powers and is more of a ceremonial figurehead. The council is responsible for making policies, approving budgets, and managing the city's affairs. The council also appoints a city manager who is responsible for the daily operation of the city.
Both forms of government have advantages and disadvantages. In a strong mayor-council form of government, the mayor has the power to take decisive action, which can lead to quick and efficient decision-making. However, this form of government can also lead to a lack of checks and balances and potential abuse of power. In contrast, a weak mayor-council form of government promotes more democratic decision-making and can prevent abuse of power. However, it can also lead to slow decision-making and a lack of accountability.
Which form of government is most effective depends on factors such as the size and complexity of the city, the political climate, and the needs and preferences of citizens. It is impossible to say definitively which form of government is better. However, ultimately the success of either type of government depends on the quality of leadership, the effectiveness of communication between the mayor and council, and the level of engagement and participation of citizens in the governance process.