This scenario describes a situation of comparative advantage. Comparative advantage refers to a country's ability to produce a good at a lower relative opportunity cost than another country. Even if one country is more efficient (has an absolute advantage) in producing both goods, there are still gains from specialization and trade based on comparative advantage.
In this case:
Columbia has an absolute advantage in coffee production (more efficient due to soil and climate conditions)
India has an absolute advantage in wheat production (more efficient due to soil and climate conditions)
However, Columbia may have a lower opportunity cost of producing coffee compared to wheat, while India may have a lower opportunity cost of producing wheat compared to coffee. This would give each country a comparative advantage in a different good.
Even though Columbia is more efficient in absolute terms at producing both coffee and wheat, it still makes sense for Columbia to specialize in coffee production and India to specialize in wheat production, based on their comparative advantages. Through trade, both countries can then consume more of both goods than if each produced in isolation.
This scenario demonstrates the principle of comparative advantage - that countries gain from international trade by producing and exporting the goods for which they have a lower opportunity cost, while importing goods for which they have a higher opportunity cost. Even when one country has an absolute advantage in all goods, comparative advantages can still differ based on relative opportunity costs of production.
So in short, both Columbia and India have a comparative advantage in the production of different goods - coffee for Columbia and wheat for India.