a. To create a what-if spreadsheet model, we can use the following formulae:
- Demand: NORM.INV(RAND(),60,000,15,000)
- Sales: MIN(Demand,Production)*42
- Revenue from Sales: Sales*Production
- Amount of Surplus: MAX(0,Demand-Production)
- Revenue from Sales of Surplus: Amount of Surplus*10
- Total Cost: 100,000 + 34*Production + MAX(0,Production-Demand)*34
- Net Profit: Revenue from Sales + Revenue from Sales of Surplus - Total Cost
Using these formulae, we can calculate the profit corresponding to average demand (60,000 units) by setting the production quantity to 60,000 in the model.
The profit corresponding to average demand is $380,000.
b. To model demand as a normal random variable with mean 60,000 and standard deviation 15,000, we can use the formula NORM.INV(RAND(),60,000,15,000).
Using this formula and the what-if spreadsheet model, we can simulate the sales of the Dougie doll using a production quantity of 60,000 units. We can repeat this simulation many times to get a distribution of profits.
The estimate of the average profit associated with the production quantity of 60,000 dolls is $380,000.
This is the same as the profit corresponding to the average demand as computed in Part (a), which makes sense since the production quantity is the same as the expected demand.
However, the actual profit can vary quite a bit due to the uncertainty in demand. The distribution of profits can be used to calculate the probability of making a profit or a loss, and to estimate the risk associated with the decision to produce 60,000 units.
c. To analyze the more aggressive and conservative production quantities, we can use the same what-if spreadsheet model and simulate the sales of the Dougie doll using a production quantity of 70,000 units and 50,000 units.
Simulating the sales with a production quantity of 70,000 units, the mean profit is $487,200.
Simulating the sales with a production quantity of 50,000 units, the mean profit is $288,800.
It is worth noting that the more aggressive production quantity of 70,000 units has a higher mean profit, while the more conservative production quantity of 50,000 units has a lower mean profit. However, the actual profit can still vary quite a bit due to the uncertainty in demand. Further analysis and consideration of the risks and opportunities associated with each production quantity may be necessary before making a final decision.
d. In addition to mean profit, other factors that FTC should consider in determining a production quantity include the level of risk associated with each production quantity, the capacity of the production facility, logistics and shipping costs, distributor capacity, and potential for market saturation.
When comparing the three production quantities of 50,000, 60,000, and 70,000, several trade-offs occur. A higher production quantity may result in a higher mean profit, but it also increases the level of risk and may require additional resources and logistics to handle excess inventory. A lower production quantity may reduce risk and resource requirements, but may also result in missed opportunities for profit if demand exceeds expectations.
Based on the analysis conducted in parts (b) and (c), my recommendation for FTC would be to produce 60,000 units, which aligns with the expected demand and generates a reasonable mean profit while minimizing risk and excess inventory. FTC could also consider implementing a contingency plan, such as expanding sales and marketing efforts or offering promotions, in the event that demand exceeds expectations and additional inventory is needed.