156k views
5 votes
nelson mandela how did he go against the social contract and was it justified yes or no evidence proof and answers in essay!

1 Answer

2 votes
Nelson Mandela, a prominent figure in the fight against apartheid in South Africa, challenged the social contract of his time through his activism and leadership. The social contract refers to the implicit agreement between individuals and their society, which outlines the rights, responsibilities, and expectations of both parties. Mandela's actions can be examined in light of this concept.

Mandela went against the social contract by advocating for equality and justice for all South Africans, regardless of their race. During apartheid, the social contract in South Africa was deeply rooted in racial segregation and discrimination, where the rights and opportunities of the majority Black population were severely restricted. Mandela believed in the inherent dignity and equality of all individuals, and he fought against the oppressive system that denied these fundamental rights to the Black population.

One of the key pieces of evidence that highlights Mandela's defiance of the social contract is his involvement in the formation and leadership of the African National Congress (ANC), which aimed to dismantle the apartheid regime and establish a democratic and non-racial South Africa. Mandela's participation in acts of civil disobedience, such as the Defiance Campaign and the Rivonia Trial, further demonstrated his willingness to challenge the existing social order and risk his personal freedom for the greater cause of justice and equality.

The justification for Mandela's actions can be argued based on several factors. Firstly, apartheid was an inherently unjust system that perpetuated discrimination, violence, and the denial of basic human rights to millions of people. Mandela recognized the moral imperative to resist and dismantle such a system in order to create a society based on principles of equality, freedom, and respect for human dignity. His struggle was not only for the rights of Black South Africans but also for the realization of the ideals of justice and democracy.

Additionally, Mandela's approach to resistance was characterized by non-violence, reconciliation, and the pursuit of a peaceful transition to democracy. Even during his imprisonment, he advocated for negotiations and dialogue as a means to bring about change. Mandela's commitment to these peaceful strategies, despite facing immense personal hardships, demonstrates his deep conviction in the pursuit of a just and inclusive society.

In conclusion, Nelson Mandela's actions went against the social contract of apartheid-era South Africa as he fought for equality and justice for all citizens. The evidence of his activism, leadership, and advocacy for a non-racial democratic society showcases his defiance of the oppressive social order. Whether his actions were justified is a complex question, but considering the inherent injustice of apartheid and his commitment to non-violence and reconciliation, many argue that Mandela's resistance was morally justified. The long-lasting impact of his efforts in bringing about democratic reforms and dismantling apartheid further supports the righteousness of his cause.
User Mane Manero
by
7.7k points