Final answer:
Speaking from a manuscript does not allow for greater spontaneity and directness compared to speaking extemporaneously.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that speaking from a manuscript allows for greater spontaneity and directness than speaking extemporaneously is False.
Speaking from a manuscript involves reading a prepared speech word-for-word, which can result in a lack of spontaneity and a more scripted delivery. On the other hand, speaking extemporaneously involves delivering a speech without a prepared script, allowing for more flexibility, spontaneity, and direct interaction with the audience.
For example, a speaker using a manuscript may be limited to the exact words on the page and may not be able to adapt their message based on audience reactions or engage in impromptu discussions. However, a speaker speaking extemporaneously has the freedom to tailor their speech on the spot, responding to audience cues and incorporating immediate feedback.