The statement that there are more detailed relationships in the flame than in the Last Supper likely refers to the varied interpretations of the scene by artists like Tintoretto and Veronese in contrast to da Vinci's balanced and composed version.
The statement is referring to the comparison between different artistic interpretations of The Last Supper. Leonardo da Vinci's version is renowned for its balance and figurative composition, whereas Tintoretto's painting introduces a more dynamic and chaotic expression with additional figures, including angels, and a prominent use of light.
Paolo Veronese's work, originally also a depiction of The Last Supper but renamed to The Feast in the House of Levi, was criticized for its inclusion of secular and irreverent elements, which led to an inquiry by the Inquisition.
In comparing these works, it is clear that each artist provided a distinctive take on the subject, with Tintoretto and Veronese adding more characters and details - perhaps leading to the statement that there are more detailed relationships in Tintoretto's flame compared to da Vinci's Last Supper.
Question:
The statement that there are more detailed relationships in the flame than in the last supper is