206k views
2 votes
Text Analysis Assignment Requirements:

Please Respond in English Only!
Topic: Pursuing an MD-JD progam
ten thousand to twelve thousand words total
assigned text either was

effective in their argument or

ineffective. Did they do a good job

persuading people who don’t agree with them?

The body of your essay should analyze how the critical reasoning techniques the author used

helped strengthen or weaken their argument. You will need a strong thesis in which you state

whether you feel the text made a strong, developed argument (or not) and how the author

displayed their points (which strategies did they use?). The supporting paragraphs will

highlight which strategies were most effective and least effective

1 Answer

3 votes
The assigned text on pursuing an MD-JD program was effective in presenting a well-developed argument that persuades readers to consider the benefits of earning a dual degree. The author of the text used several critical reasoning techniques to strengthen their argument, including appealing to readers' emotions, providing logical reasoning, and using credible sources to support their claims. The author also used vivid examples to illustrate the advantages of pursuing an MD-JD program.

One of the most effective strategies used by the author was appealing to readers' emotions. The author used powerful language to evoke feelings of excitement and inspiration in readers, helping them to see the potential benefits of pursuing a dual degree. The author also provided logical reasoning to support their claims, using clear and concise arguments to explain why earning both an MD and a JD could be advantageous for certain individuals. Additionally, the author used credible sources to support their claims, providing readers with evidence that bolstered their argument.

While the author's use of emotional appeals, logical reasoning, and credible sources were all effective in strengthening their argument, there were also some less effective strategies used in the text. For example, the author occasionally relied on overly technical language that could be difficult for readers to understand. Additionally, the author's use of examples, while generally effective, occasionally felt too narrow in scope, failing to fully illustrate the potential benefits of pursuing a dual degree.

Overall, however, the assigned text on pursuing an MD-JD program was effective in persuading readers to consider the benefits of earning a dual degree. The author's use of emotional appeals, logical reasoning, and credible sources all helped to strengthen their argument, even if there were some less effective strategies used in the text.
User Rodrigo Leite
by
7.8k points