Final answer:
Some types of knowledge, like logical and mathematical truths, are less open to interpretation, being based on a priori knowledge. By contrast, procedural knowledge and phenomena perceived through our senses are more subjective and interpretative. The structuring and limits of our cognitive abilities also influence our understanding of facts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Some types of knowledge are indeed less open to interpretation than others. Logical knowledge and mathematical truths, such as the fact that the square root of 9 is 3, fall into the category of a priori knowledge, which can be understood through reason alone and are objective in nature. On the other hand, personal experiences and phenomena that we perceive through our senses, though they constitute a significant part of our knowledge of the world, are more subjective and open to interpretation.
Another distinction is between propositional knowledge (knowledge that) and procedural knowledge (knowledge how). Propositional knowledge involves statements or facts that are either true or false, and this type of knowledge is the main focus of traditional epistemology. Procedural knowledge, however, is about one's ability to perform certain tasks and is often not as easily expressed in declarative sentences, making it less obvious and more interpretable.
Philosophers affirm that while it is possible to have knowledge of the world, our understanding is shaped and limited by the categories of our mind, as theorized by Immanuel Kant, meaning that even factual knowledge is influenced by our cognitive structures.