205k views
3 votes
3. A fecal transplant appears to be somewhat risky and dangerous . List several potential dangers of the procedure citing evidence from the text to support your inference .

4.Considering the dangers mentioned in question 3, some individuals may disagree with the use of fecal transplants. Make a claim. Should fecal transplants be used as a means of combatting Clostridium difficile? State your claim in a complete sentence, and provide 4 supporting details from the text to back up your opinionList the details using phrases in your own words citing the paragraph each is found in.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Claim: Despite the potential risks, fecal transplants should still be employed as an effective means to combat Clostridium difficile.

Supporting Detail 1 (Paragraph 5): The procedure can successfully restore the balance of healthy bacteria in the gut, leading to a resolution of C. difficile infection symptoms.

Supporting Detail 2 (Paragraph 11): Fecal transplants have fewer side effects compared to antibiotics, and could be viewed as a safer and more efficient treatment.

Supporting Detail 3 (Paragraph 15): The use of endoscopes in the procedure has shown to be safe and reduce the chances of complications.

Supporting Detail 4 (Paragraph 20): Although there is a risk of infection, it is considered to be rare, and steps can be taken to mitigate the risk.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Anand Nimje
by
8.4k points