Final answer:
Structured interviews may be a better predictor of job reliability than unstructured interviews because they are free of bias and stereotypes, ask the same questions of each candidate, and are based on job analysis for the position.
Step-by-step explanation:
b. Structured interviews are more likely to be free of bias and stereotypes than unstructured interviews. This is because structured interviews use a standardized set of questions for every candidate, which helps ensure fairness and consistency in the interview process.
c. Structured interviews ask the same questions of each candidate, which allows for a more systematic and objective evaluation of their qualifications. This helps eliminate potential biases that may arise when interviewers ask different questions to different candidates.
d. Structured interviews are based on job analysis for the position, which means that the questions are designed to assess the specific skills and competencies required for the job. This makes structured interviews a better predictor of job performance because they directly evaluate the candidate's suitability for the role.