208k views
2 votes
10. What was the main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution?

A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

B. Separating the powers of the federal government into three branches would lead to confusion and chaos.

C. The state governments would still exercise too much power over the national government

under the new Constitution.

D. It was unclear whether the Supreme Court or the individual states had the power to

declare federal laws unconstitutional

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

Step-by-step explanation:

The main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution is that "Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government."

This is evident as they eventually asked for the establishment of a Bill of Rights to serves as a means of protecting the Individual and states rights that may be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

User Krish KvR
by
3.4k points