Burnett Miller initially believed the wartime propaganda was "an awful lot of baloney" because he likely had a skeptical attitude towards the information being presented. he might have questioned the accuracy and truthfulness of the messages being conveyed, considering that propaganda often aims to shape public opinion and manipulate perceptions.
as the war progressed, Burnett Miller's attitude likely changed due to several factors:
first-hand experiences: as Miller witnessed the events and realities of the war, he would have encountered situations that contradicted or challenged the propaganda he had previously dismissed. personal experiences, such as witnessing the destruction, loss of lives, or interacting with soldiers and civilians directly affected by the war, could have made him reconsider his initial skepticism.
access to diverse perspectives: over time, Miller might have gained access to alternative sources of information, including news reports, testimonies, or firsthand accounts from soldiers, journalists, or civilians involved in the conflict. this exposure to different viewpoints and narratives would have provided him with a more comprehensive understanding of the situation and potentially countered the simplistic narratives presented in wartime propaganda.
recognition of propaganda tactics: as Miller became more familiar with the strategies employed in propaganda, he might have developed a critical eye and recognized the manipulative techniques used to shape public opinion. this awareness would have allowed him to differentiate between biased propaganda and more reliable sources of information. overall, Burnett Miller's attitude likely evolved as he gained a deeper understanding of the war through direct experiences and exposure to diverse perspectives, leading him to reassess his initial skepticism of wartime propaganda.