Question

100 pointsss also we are going against the discoverer keeping the treasure

Finding Sunken Treasure: Argumentative Performance Task

Part 2

You will now review your notes and sources, and plan, draft, revise, and edit your writing. You may use your notes and refer to the sources. Now read your assignment and the information about how your writing will be scored; then begin your work.

Your Assignment:

As a follow-up to the recent class field trip in which you viewed treasure found on a sunken ship, your history teacher has asked that you write an essay in which you argue whether or not a discoverer should have the right to keep sunken treasure that has been found. Your argument will be posted on the class website for teachers, students, and parents to read.

Your assignment is to use the sources to write a multi-paragraph argumentative essay supporting or opposing the claim of a discoverer to keep the sunken treasure that was found. Make sure you establish an argumentative claim, acknowledge opposing arguments, and support your claim with reasons and details from the sources you have read. Develop your ideas clearly and use your own words, except when quoting directly from the sources. Be sure to identify the sources by title or number when using details or facts directly from the sources.​

Answer 1

Answer choice B and C are the correct choices

Answer 2

Let me know if this helps:

Should the discoverer of sunken treasure have the right to keep it?

The discovery of sunken treasure is a fascinating event that has captured the imagination of people for centuries. However, there is a great deal of debate about who should have the right to keep the treasure once it is found. Some people believe that the discoverer should be allowed to keep the treasure, while others believe that the treasure should be returned to the country or state in which it was found.

There are several arguments in favor of allowing the discoverer to keep the treasure. First, the discoverer often takes great risks and invests a lot of time and money in finding the treasure. It is only fair that they should be rewarded for their efforts. Second, the discoverer may be the only person who knows where the treasure is located. If they are not allowed to keep the treasure, it may never be found. Third, the discoverer may be able to use the treasure to fund further exploration and research. This could lead to the discovery of even more treasure.

However, there are also several arguments against allowing the discoverer to keep the treasure. First, the treasure may have been lost for centuries. It is possible that the original owners of the treasure are long since dead. In this case, it is not clear who the treasure actually belongs to. Second, the treasure may be of great historical or cultural significance. If it is sold to a private collector, it may be lost to the public forever. Third, the treasure may be located in a sensitive or environmentally sensitive area. If it is excavated, it could damage the environment.

In my opinion, the discoverer of sunken treasure should not have the right to keep it. The treasure should be returned to the country or state in which it was found. This is the fairest and most equitable solution. It ensures that the treasure is preserved for future generations and that it is not lost to the public. It also ensures that the treasure is not used to fund further exploration and research that could damage the environment.

In conclusion, there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate about who should have the right to keep sunken treasure. However, I believe that the most fair and equitable solution is to return the treasure to the country or state in which it was found. This ensures that the treasure is preserved for future generations and that it is not lost to the public.

Step-by-step explanation: