Question

Abstract art does not use images or common symbols to create a message. How can a critic interpret it?

Select one:

a.
The critic can discuss colors, lines, and technical aspects.


b.
Even abstract art has a tone that can be interpreted.


c.
Abstract art requires critics that specialize in this type of art.


d.
Critics can imagine the type of symbols that the artist would add.

Answer 1

a. The critic can discuss colors, lines, and technical aspects.

When interpreting abstract art, a critic can analyze the use of color, line, composition, and other technical aspects of the work. They may also consider the artist's background, artistic influences, and intentions when creating the piece. While abstract art may not have a recognizable subject matter or narrative, it can still convey emotions, moods, or ideas through its formal elements. Therefore, a critic can focus on the formal qualities of the artwork, rather than relying on common symbols or recognizable images to create a message. While some critics may specialize in abstract art, all critics can use their expertise to interpret abstract art based on its technical aspects and the context in which it was created.

Step-by-step explanation:

please follow me for more if you need any help