148k views
0 votes
How does ceaser's ambition negatively effect his personality and rule

User Amuoeba
by
8.2k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

Explanation: Brutus decides that ambition causes people to turn their backs on others, and because of this, Caesar must be killed. When Caesar is finally assassinated, Brutus explains to the commoners that Caesar has paid for the crime of ambition with his life. At times Caesar showed mercy to conquered people by offering them Roman citizenship. But he was also a ruthless warrior, having slaughtered thousands in his conquests. Some scholars considered him a tyrant, citing his forceful takeover of Rome and bullying his way into power. His ambition makes him power hungry and he lacks the honor to back up his overzealous behavior. Cassius envies Caesar and because of this he resorts to bribery, assassinations, and imposing taxes for personal gain...

User Renjith
by
8.4k points
5 votes
Caesar's ambition had a negative impact on his personality and rule in several ways:
Arrogance: Caesar's ambition made him believe that he was invincible and entitled to power. This led to arrogance and a sense of superiority over others.

Selfishness: Caesar's ambition made him prioritize his own interests over those of the people he ruled. He wanted to expand his empire and gain more power, which often came at the expense of others.

Ruthlessness: Caesar was willing to do whatever it took to achieve his goals, including using violence and force. This made him feared by his enemies and even by his own people.

Lack of trust: Caesar's ambition made him paranoid and suspicious of those around him. He saw potential rivals and enemies everywhere, which made him distrustful and isolated.

Ignoring the needs of the people: Caesar's ambition made him more focused on his own personal ambition than on the needs of the people he ruled. This led to neglect of important issues affecting the population, such as poverty and unemployment.

Overall, Caesar's ambition made him a self-centered and ruthless leader who was more concerned with his own power and glory than with the well-being of his people. This ultimately led to his downfall and the end of his reign.

Sorry if I wrote a lot
User Salius
by
9.0k points

Related questions

1 answer
2 votes
120k views
asked Dec 26, 2019 157k views
Grisha S asked Dec 26, 2019
by Grisha S
8.2k points
1 answer
5 votes
157k views