The value of natural places is multifaceted and cannot be reduced to a single dimension. While natural places certainly offer aesthetic beauty that can be appreciated, their value extends beyond that. Natural places are home to a diverse range of flora and fauna, many of which have yet to be fully studied or understood. By preserving natural places, we can learn about the intricate relationships between different species, as well as the complex ecological systems that sustain life on our planet.
Moreover, natural places provide important ecosystem services that are critical to human well-being. For example, forests provide clean air and water, regulate climate, and offer protection against natural disasters like floods and landslides. Wetlands filter pollutants, recharge groundwater, and provide habitat for migratory birds. Coral reefs protect coastlines from erosion, support fisheries, and offer recreational opportunities for millions of people.
While it is true that natural places can be appreciated for their beauty, this should not be the sole reason for their protection. The complex web of life that exists in natural places is invaluable, and losing it would be a significant loss for humanity. Therefore, we should strive to protect natural places not just for their aesthetic value, but also for the important ecological services they provide and the knowledge they offer us.
(You can just summarize it to make it shorter but this is the long answer to your question)