Question

According to Ryberg, if the motive for observation is the reduction of crime, then people's rights to privacy are respected. violated upheld not violated.

Answer 1

According to Ryberg, if the motive for observation is the reduction of crime, then the rights to privacy are upheld when searches are conducted reasonably and legally.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to Ryberg, if the observation's motive is the reduction of crime, then people's rights to privacy are upheld, assuming the search and seizure are reasonable and comply with legal standards. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures, and this includes the requirement that law enforcement obtains a warrant supported by probable cause. The right to privacy is a fundamental right recognized by various international laws and national constitutions, stipulating that interferences by public authority must be lawful and necessary in a democratic society. The concept outlined by Ryberg is aligned with this approach to privacy and criminal investigation protocols.

Answer 2

According to Ryberg, if the motive for observation is the reduction of crime, then people's rights to privacy are upheld.

Ryberg argues that when the primary intention behind surveillance or observation is the reduction of crime, it can be seen as a legitimate and justifiable intrusion into people's privacy.

In such cases, the emphasis is on maintaining public safety and preventing criminal activities which outweigh individuals' privacy rights in certain situations. This aligns with the notion that the greater good of crime reduction justifies limited invasions of privacy to ensure the safety and security of society as a whole.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.