Answer:In this case, the most appropriate method of causal reasoning to adopt is the Method of Agreement, as it involves examining cases where the effect is present and identifying the factors that are common to all those cases.
Using the Method of Agreement, we can identify that both Mrs. Batsa and Mrs. Kumisa complained of pain after consuming meals that contained cream, while their partners who ate the same meals but did not consume cream did not complain of any pain. This suggests that cream may be the most probable cause of the nausea experienced by both patients.
However, it is important to consider the possibility of causal fallacies, such as the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore because of this), where a cause-and-effect relationship is assumed based on temporal sequence alone. In this case, it is possible that the nausea experienced by both patients was caused by something other than the cream, such as food poisoning from contaminated rice or yam chips.
To rule out the possibility of other causes, further investigation is needed, such as testing samples of the food consumed by both patients for contaminants. However, based on the information available, the most probable cause of the nausea experienced by both patients is the cream.
Step-by-step explanation: