134k views
1 vote
I've been stuck on this page for a while..

so i'm almost done this assignment but i cant figure out why this graph is misleading cause it looks accurate to me
help

I've been stuck on this page for a while.. so i'm almost done this assignment but-example-1
User Alana
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

0 votes
b the higher the price the bigger the box is looking for another answer though so hold on
User Kazz
by
8.1k points
3 votes

Answer:

See below.

Explanation:

a) $81235 - $15405 = $65830

b)

1) The graph uses cubes to represent the amount of sales.

2) I wonder if the amount of sales is proportional to the length of the side of the cube or to the volume of the cube.

c)

Using a ruler, the Year 1 cube has side length 5 units.

Using the same ruler, the Year 5 cube has side length 18 units.

The volume of the Year 5 cube is 5832 units³. The volume of the Year 1 cube is 125 units³.

The ratio of the volumes of Year 5 cube to the Year 1 cube is

5832/125 = 47:1

The ratio of sales of Year 5 to Year 1 is

81235/15405 = 5:1

The sales of Year 5 are approximately 5 times the sales of Year 1, tbut the cube of Year 5 has approximately 47 times the volume of the cube of Year 1. The graph is misleading because the volumes of the cubes are not proportional to the amounts of sales.

d) 47 times in volume

User Austin France
by
8.6k points

No related questions found