1. In the essay "Let's Support School Uniforms," the claim is that schools should implement a uniform policy, and the supporting reasons are that uniforms can increase student safety, promote a sense of community, and reduce social and economic inequalities.
2. In the essay "School Uniforms: They're Not Worth It," the claim is that school uniforms are not a worthwhile policy, and the supporting reasons are that uniforms are costly, restrict student freedom of expression, and do not improve academic performance.
3. In terms of evidence, "Let's Support School Uniforms" provides statistics and anecdotes to support its claims. For example, the author cites a study that found a decrease in discipline referrals after a school implemented a uniform policy, and shares a personal anecdote about feeling a sense of unity with classmates while wearing a uniform. However, some of the evidence may be weaker, such as the claim that uniforms can deter gang activity, which is not well-supported. In "School Uniforms: They're Not Worth It," the author uses statistics and expert opinions to argue against uniforms, such as the finding that schools with uniforms do not necessarily perform better academically. The author also uses personal anecdotes to support their claim about freedom of expression. Overall, both texts use evidence to support their claims, but "School Uniforms: They're Not Worth It" may be more effective in using a variety of sources and research to back up its arguments.
4. One logical fallacy that may be present in either essay is the appeal to authority fallacy, where the author relies too heavily on the opinions of experts or authorities without providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.