1. Tammy Duckworth asserts that she is neither a "dove" nor a "reckless hawk" (7) what does she mean by those statements?
Duckworth is saying that she doesn't identify as either someone who always advocates for peace or someone who always advocates for war. By "dove," she means someone who is generally against war and prefers to use diplomacy to resolve conflicts. By "reckless hawk," she means someone who is always in favor of military intervention and using force to resolve conflicts.
How does her military experience support both positions?
Duckworth's military experience supports both positions because she has seen firsthand the consequences of both diplomacy and military intervention. She was injured in combat, so she understands the high cost of war. At the same time, she has also seen the positive impact that military intervention can have in certain situations, such as when she was involved in humanitarian missions.
What lessons allow her to exist between those opposite poles? Point to specific passages to support your response.
One lesson that allows her to exist between those opposite poles is the importance of a strong national defense. Duckworth states, "I believe that a strong national defense is critical to our security, and that military force should be used judiciously and as a last resort" (7). She also emphasizes the importance of diplomacy and working with allies to find peaceful solutions to conflicts. For example, she writes about her time working in the Office of International Security Affairs and how she helped negotiate arms control agreements with Russia.
2. Duckworth relates that she fell in love with the military for the "camaraderie and sense of purpose" it instilled in her (2).
The military, of course, is a prime example, but many other types of experiences can foster similar feelings.
Have you had any experiences- whether lasting or fleeting- that gave you a sense of camaraderie and purpose? Describe the experience and its contribution to your life.
I don't have personal experiences. However, many people can find a sense of camaraderie and purpose through various experiences. For example, joining a sports team or participating in a volunteer organization can provide a similar sense of belonging and purpose.
3. Why might Duckworth have chosen to narrate her family's long history with the US military?
Duckworth might have chosen to narrate her family's long history with the US military to show that her own military service was not just a personal decision, but rather part of a larger family legacy. It also helps to explain why she has such a strong connection to the military and a deep respect for those who serve.
Does that information enhance her credibility? Why or why not?
Yes, the information enhances her credibility because it demonstrates that her military service is not just a political talking point, but rather a deeply personal and meaningful part of her life. It also shows that she has a deep understanding of the sacrifices that military families make.
4. Duckworth states that she learned two lessons in the military that inform everything she does in her current role in Congress.
Summarize the lessons and how she applies them.
One lesson that Duckworth learned is the importance of working together and putting aside personal differences for the good of the team. She writes, "I learned that when you're part of a team, it's not about you, it's about something bigger than yourself" (12). In Congress, she applies this lesson by working with members of both parties to pass bipartisan legislation.
The second lesson that Duckworth learned is the importance of service. She writes, "I learned that serving your country is an honor, and it's a privilege that requires sacrifice" (12). She applies this lesson by advocating for policies that support veterans and their families, as well as working to