95.7k views
0 votes
Compare Points of View Explain how John

Brown's approach to abolitionism differed from

the approaches of other abolitionists at the time.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Many abolitionists advocated for the gradual abolition of slavery through legal and political means. On the other hand, Brown believed that slavery could only be abolished through armed insurrection. He believed that violence was necessary to end slavery and was willing to use force to achieve his goals.

In 1856, Brown and other men attacked pro-slavery settlers in Kansas, an attach known as the "Pottawatomie massacre." This violent act shocked many abolitionists, who saw Brown's actions as counterproductive to their cause. However, Brown believed that violence would draw attention to the evils of slavery and spur others to action.

Brown's most famous action was his raid on the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia in 1859. Brown and his followers planned to seize the weapons stored there and use them to arm a slave rebellion. The raid was a failure, and Brown was captured and eventually executed for his actions. However, his willingness to use violence to end slavery made him a hero to many abolitionists, and he became a symbol of the fight against slavery.

[Get instant answers, essays, and research papers through proffrank01[at]gm ail.c om. I am sorry, but delete this section before submitting this answer. You deserve to score maximum points, so let me help you].

Overall, John Brown's approach to abolitionism was unique in his willingness to use violence to achieve his goals. Many abolitionists at the time believed in the power of legal and political means to end slavery. Brown believed that violence would draw attention to the issue and spur others to action. His methods were controversial, but Brown's actions sparked a national conversation about slavery, leading to its abolition.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Ruthi
by
7.8k points