60.4k views
2 votes
Evaluate the success of the Nixon administration at ending Great Society programs.

User Subhacom
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

President Nixon's administration reduced or restructured some Great Society programs but did not completely dismantle them. The need to end the Vietnam War and implement more conservative fiscal policies influenced these changes, but significant elements of the Great Society, like Medicare and Medicaid, remained intact.

Step-by-step explanation:

The success of the Nixon administration in ending Great Society programs is not quantifiable in a binary sense of complete termination, as many elements of President Johnson's vision survived, albeit with alterations. However, the Nixon administration did make efforts to scale back or restructure some of these programs.

For example, President Nixon sought to control government spending, reflected in his attempts to impound funds and to limit the further growth of welfare programs.

Johnson's Great Society aimed to eliminate poverty and racial injustice, and it included significant initiatives such as Medicare and Medicaid, expansions in Social Security benefits, welfare payments, and increased federal funding for education.

Although not entirely eliminated, these programs faced significant funding reductions from Nixon's policy changes amid concerns of growing federal responsibilities and deficit spending.

President Nixon's approach to social welfare reflected a broader shift toward a more conservative fiscal policy. The imperative to end the war in Vietnam also impacted domestic spending, which President Johnson had identified as a competing priority with Great Society initiatives.

Nixon's eventual peace with Vietnam and the redirection of funds did impact the continuity of Great Society programs, but didn't entirely dismantle them.

User DarRay
by
8.3k points
5 votes

The Nixon administration was known for its efforts to limit the expansion of Great Society programs, which were established by President Lyndon B. Johnson to address poverty, education, healthcare, and other social issues in the United States. While the Nixon administration did take steps to scale back some of these programs, the success of their efforts to end the Great Society is a matter of debate among historians and political analysts.

On one hand, the Nixon administration did make significant changes to some of the Great Society programs, particularly in the areas of welfare and healthcare. In 1971, Nixon proposed a Family Assistance Plan (FAP) that would have replaced many of the existing welfare programs with a guaranteed annual income for low-income families. While the FAP ultimately failed to gain support in Congress, Nixon's efforts to reform welfare were seen as a significant departure from the Great Society approach of providing a wide range of social services.

Additionally, Nixon was successful in scaling back some of the healthcare programs established under the Great Society. In 1972, he vetoed a bill that would have expanded Medicare to cover all Americans, arguing that it would be too costly and would discourage private insurers from offering coverage. While Nixon did ultimately sign a compromise bill that expanded Medicare eligibility for certain groups, his opposition to universal healthcare was seen as a significant departure from the Great Society's goals.

On the other hand, some argue that the Nixon administration's efforts to end the Great Society were not entirely successful. Many of the programs established under the Great Society continued to operate throughout Nixon's presidency, albeit with some changes and reforms. For example, while the FAP failed to pass Congress, many of the existing welfare programs remained in place, and Nixon did not make significant changes to other Great Society programs such as Head Start or the National Endowment for the Arts.

Furthermore, some argue that the Nixon administration's efforts to limit the Great Society were not entirely successful in achieving their goals of reducing government spending and promoting individual responsibility. Critics argued that Nixon's welfare reforms, for example, did not do enough to address the root causes of poverty and inequality and that they may have actually worsened these issues by reducing access to crucial social services.

Overall, while the Nixon administration did make some significant changes to the Great Society programs, the success of their efforts to end these programs is a matter of debate. While some argue that the administration succeeded in scaling back the Great Society, others argue that the programs continued to operate, albeit with some changes and reforms, and that the Nixon administration's efforts to limit these programs may have had unintended consequences.

User Jordan Montel
by
8.1k points