Answer: All of the above are true regarding judicial activism.
Judicial activism is often associated with the Warren Court, which was known for its progressive decisions in the 1950s and 1960s. The concept of judicial activism involves the idea that the Supreme Court should take an active role in shaping government policy, rather than simply interpreting the law as it is written. This can result in both liberal and conservative positions, depending on the issue at hand. Overall, judicial activism involves a willingness on the part of the Supreme Court to go beyond the strict confines of the law in order to address important social and political issues.