180k views
5 votes
Hi,

I don't undestand how epidemiology, through targeted studies, has made it possible to make public health choices to fight cancer. In particular why there is systematic screening for breast, prostate or colon cancer but not systematic for the pancreas, testicle, bladder, etc.

Thanks in advance !

User Wikp
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Epidemiology is the study of patterns, causes, and effects of health and disease conditions in populations. Through targeted studies, epidemiologists have identified risk factors for various types of cancer, which has led to the development of screening programs and other public health interventions.

Breast, prostate, and colon cancer are among the most common types of cancer and have well-established screening programs in place. This is because these types of cancer have a relatively high incidence rate, and screening tests are effective in detecting early stages of the disease when treatment is most effective. In addition, there are well-established risk factors for these types of cancer, such as age, family history, and lifestyle factors like diet and physical activity.

In contrast, screening for other types of cancer, such as pancreatic, testicular, and bladder cancer, is not as systematic. This is because these types of cancer have a lower incidence rate, and screening tests are less effective in detecting early stages of the disease. For example, pancreatic cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage because symptoms do not appear until the disease has progressed. Testicular cancer is relatively rare, and self-examination is often effective in detecting early signs of the disease. Bladder cancer is often diagnosed after symptoms appear, but there is ongoing research into the effectiveness of screening tests for this type of cancer.

In addition to incidence rates and screening effectiveness, other factors that influence public health choices for cancer prevention and control include cost-effectiveness, access to healthcare, and potential harms associated with screening tests. For example, some types of cancer screening tests, such as mammography for breast cancer, can lead to false-positive results and unnecessary follow-up procedures, which can cause anxiety and additional costs.

In summary, epidemiology has played a crucial role in identifying risk factors for various types of cancer, which has led to the development of screening programs and other public health interventions. The choice to implement systematic screening for breast, prostate, and colon cancer is based on a combination of factors, including incidence rates, screening effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, access to healthcare, and potential harms associated with screening tests.

Your Welcome

User Stephan Kulla
by
8.0k points