Final answer:
Kirsty is not correct because doubling the size of an acute angle can still result in an acute angle, not necessarily an obtuse angle.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kirsty's statement that doubling the size of an acute angle always results in an obtuse angle is not correct.
An acute angle is any angle that measures less than 90 degrees. When you double the size of an angle, you multiply its measure by 2. So, if you start with an acute angle of 30 degrees and double it, you would get an angle of 60 degrees, which is still an acute angle. This shows that Kirsty's statement is not always true.
Therefore, Kirsty is not correct because doubling the size of an acute angle can still result in an acute angle, not necessarily an obtuse angle.