Question

What is Just Desserts (the "justice" model)?

Answer 1

Just Desserts, in the context of justice, refers to receiving the appropriate or deserved punishment for one's actions, based on the principle of retributive justice. This concept emphasizes fairness and equity in the criminal justice system by ensuring that individuals are treated according to the principle of proportionality.

Step-by-step explanation:

The concept of Just Desserts in the context of justice refers to the idea of receiving the appropriate or deserved punishment for one's actions. It is related to the principle of retributive justice, which focuses on punishing individuals in proportion to their offenses. Just Desserts suggests that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and that the punishment should fit the crime.

For example, if someone commits a serious crime like murder, according to the concept of Just Desserts, they should receive a punishment that aligns with the severity of their action, such as a long prison sentence or even the death penalty in some cases.

Overall, Just Desserts emphasizes the importance of fairness and equity in the criminal justice system by ensuring that individuals are treated according to the principle of proportionality.

Answer 2

"Just Desserts" is a theory of criminal punishment that emphasizes proportionality and retribution. According to this model, punishment should be proportionate to the harm caused by the crime and should be inflicted solely for the purpose of punishing the offender, rather than as a means of rehabilitation or deterrence.

In the "Just Desserts" model, offenders are held responsible for their actions and are punished in a manner that is commensurate with the severity of their crimes. The punishment is designed to balance the scales of justice and provide a sense of closure and satisfaction for victims and society as a whole.

Proponents of the "Just Desserts" model argue that it is a fair and just way to punish offenders, as it recognizes the harm that has been done and provides a tangible consequence for their actions. However, critics argue that this model is overly punitive and does not take into account the underlying causes of criminal behavior or the potential for rehabilitation. As a result, many justice systems have adopted a more balanced approach that incorporates elements of both punishment and rehabilitation.