125k views
1 vote
Write a paragraph explaining how "The Last Wilderness Preserve" and "A New Land of

Opportunity" agree and disagree on the effect humans have had on climate change in
Antarctica. Use details from both texts to support your answer.

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The films "A New Land of Opportunity" and "The Last Wilderness Preserve" offer opposing perspectives on how human activity has contributed to climate change in Antarctica. In "The Last Wilderness Preserve," the author makes the case that Antarctica is one of the few remaining pristine wilderness regions on the planet because it has been virtually unspoiled by human activities. The Antarctic Treaty, which restricts human activity and protects the area's distinctive ecosystems, has protected the continent, according to the author. However, "A New Land of Opportunity" emphasizes the potential economic advantages of human development in Antarctica, including improved resource access and chances for scientific study. According to the article, there may be both beneficial and negative environmental repercussions of human activities in Antarctica, including possible effects on climate change. Both texts admit that people have an impact on Antarctica, but they have different opinions about how much this impact has been felt and how best to manage the continent's resources.

User Zulukas
by
7.8k points