Question

How does the reader know that the narrator of the story is not the author?

It is written in first-person, from the perspective of Marais Van der Vyver.

The tone of the story is compassionate and non-judgmental, which does not match
how the author would approach writing about this topic based on her background.
The story is fiction, and so therefore the author cannot be the narrator.

It speaks in a disparaging way about Black people and their fight for justice, but the author used her writing to combat inequality in South Africa.

Answer 1

Based on the given options, the following serves as evidence that the narrator of the story is not the author:

A. It is written in first-person, from the perspective of Marais Van der Vyver.

The use of a first-person perspective from a character's point of view suggests that the narrator is a fictional character, distinct from the author. It implies that the author is writing from a creative standpoint and is not directly involved in the events of the story.

Option B is not accurate because there is no mention of the author's background or how she would approach writing about the topic.

Option C is also not accurate because even though the story is fiction, the author can still be the narrator if the author chooses to write in the first person.

Option D is not accurate because there is no indication that the narrator speaks disparagingly about Black people or their fight for justice. In fact, the use of a first-person perspective allows the reader to gain insight into the narrator's thoughts and feelings, which may reveal biases and prejudices that are present in the character, but not necessarily in the author.

Step-by-step explanation: