Question

Who is involved of the Miranda v. Arizona?

What happened in the Miranda v. Arizona?

How did the lower court rule in Miranda v. Arizona?

What was the legal issue at hand to be decided in Miranda v. Arizona?

What arguments ware given in Miranda v. Arizona?

What precedents were cited in. Miranda v. Arizona?

What was the decision of the court in Miranda v. Arizona?

What was their reasoning in Miranda v. Arizona?

Were there any significant dissenting opinions in Miranda v. Arizona?

Answer 1

1. a woman, who accused him of kidnapping and raping her.
2. ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution.
3. 5–4 decision for Miranda
The Fifth Amendment requires that law enforcement officials advise suspects of their right to remain silent and to obtain an attorney during interrogations while in police custody
4. an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination
5. an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution.
6. an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution.
7. an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-discrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution

Answer 2

Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was identified in a police lineup by a woman, who accused him of kidnapping and raping her. Miranda was arrested and questioned by the police for two hours until he confessed to the crimes.