Answer: The answer is B. It allowed representatives from different sections to support some proposals and not others.
Step-by-step explanation: The Omnibus Bill was a package of five bills that dealt with various issues related to slavery and territorial expansion. It was highly controversial, and many representatives from different sections of the country opposed some or all of its provisions. In order to reach a compromise, Senator Henry Clay proposed breaking up the Omnibus Bill into its constituent parts and allowing representatives to vote on each bill separately. This allowed representatives from different sections to support some proposals and not others, which made it easier to find common ground and reach a compromise. For example, representatives from the North might support the bill banning the slave trade in Washington, D.C., but oppose the Fugitive Slave Act, while representatives from the South might support the Fugitive Slave Act, but oppose the bill banning the slave trade in Washington, D.C. By breaking up the Omnibus Bill into its constituent parts, each provision could be considered on its own merits, and representatives could vote for the bills that they supported, without having to vote for bills they opposed. This ultimately allowed for the Compromise of 1850 to be reached.