Answer:
Indirect rule
Step-by-step explanation:
This practice is commonly known as "indirect rule" and was frequently used by colonial powers during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The basic idea was to use local leaders and traditional institutions to govern the colony, rather than directly imposing the colonial power's laws and values.
Indirect rule was often seen as a more cost-effective way of maintaining colonial control, as it allowed the colonial power to rely on existing social structures and reduced the need for large numbers of European administrators. However, it also reinforced existing power imbalances and often led to the exploitation and oppression of the colonized population.
The use of a colony's own soldiers to enforce colonial rule was a common feature of indirect rule. These soldiers were often drawn from the same social groups as the local leaders, and were given a degree of authority over their fellow colonized people. This could create resentment and mistrust between different groups within the colony, and could also lead to violence and conflict.