114k views
5 votes
The Wilmot Proviso and the Free-Soil movement

- both proposed to restrict the expansion of slavery into new territories.
- contradicted each other with regard to expansion of slavery into new territories.
- recommended popular sovereignty to resolve the issue of slavery in new territories.
- supported secession in response to unwelcome mandates regarding slavery.

User Louiza
by
7.0k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

both proposed to restrict the expansion of slavery into new territories.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Wilmot Proviso was a proposed amendment to a bill in Congress in 1846 that aimed to prohibit slavery in any new territory acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. The Free-Soil movement emerged in response to the Wilmot Proviso and supported the idea that slavery should not be allowed to expand into new territories.

Therefore, both the Wilmot Proviso and the Free-Soil movement proposed to restrict the expansion of slavery into new territories.

User Artjom Kurapov
by
8.6k points
5 votes

The Wilmot Proviso and the Free-Soil movement both proposed to restrict the expansion of slavery into new territories. They were both motivated by the desire to limit the spread of slavery into new states and territories, and they both sought to promote the interests of free labor and free soil in the West. While there were some differences between the two, such as tactics and strategies for achieving their goals, they were both fundamentally opposed to the expansion of slavery into new territories.

User SystematicFrank
by
7.1k points