123k views
3 votes
Help asap!!!!

Read the excerpt from The Republic by Plato.

And so at last, instead of loving contention and glory, men become lovers of trade and money; they honour and look up to the rich man, and make a ruler of him, and dishonour the poor man.

They do so.

They next proceed to make a law which fixes a sum of money as the qualification of citizenship; the sum is higher in one place and lower in another, as the oligarchy is more or less exclusive; and they allow no one whose property falls below the amount fixed to have any share in the government. These changes in the constitution they effect by force of arms, if intimidation has not already done their work.

Read the excerpt from Utopia by Sir Thomas More.

Even the Syphogrants, though excused by the law, yet do not excuse themselves, but work, that by their examples they may excite the industry of the rest of the people; the like exemption is allowed to those who, being recommended to the people by the priests, are, by the secret suffrages of the Syphogrants, privileged from labour, that they may apply themselves wholly to study; and if any of these fall short of those hopes that they seemed at first to give, they are obliged to return to work; and sometimes a mechanic that so employs his leisure hours as to make a considerable advancement in learning is eased from being a tradesman and ranked among their learned men.

Which statement is supported by both arguments?

Injustice will unquestionably make a society fall.
Social classes must coexist in a thriving society.
Money is the sole driving factor for most people.
Leaders should be excused from manual labor.

User Binu
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

OPTION (A) Edge

"Injustice will unquestionably make a society fall."

Step-by-step explanation:

User Sveisvei
by
6.9k points
3 votes

Answer:

Injustice will unquestionably make a society fall.

User Elias Toivanen
by
7.7k points