Register
Explain why it is not necessary to know the number of parts in an “oodle” to solve the prob- lem in part a.
121k views
1 vote
Explain why it is not necessary to know the number of parts in an “oodle” to solve the prob- lem in part a.

Explain why it is not necessary to know the number of parts in an “oodle” to solve-example-1
User Micah Henning
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

6 votes
That’s a good question
User Pragnesh Rupapara
by
8.5k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

How do you balance __H2SO4 + __B(OH)3 --> __B2(SO4)3 + __H2O
Can someone complete the chemical reactions, or write which one do not occur, and provide tehir types? *c2h4+h2o *c3h8 + hcl *c2h2+br2 *c4h10+br2 *c3h6+br2
Why is gold preferred as a superior metal over silver and bronze?
What is the evidence of a chemical reaction when the fireworks go off
Which of the following statements does not describe a physical property of a piece of chalk A. Chalk is solid B.chalk can be broken into pieces C. Chalk is white D. Chalk will bubble in vinegar
Link Copied!