Answer:
The government was largely indifferent to the growing demand from both domestic and international sources to change their strategy.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the early years of apartheid, the government was largely indifferent to the growing demand from both domestic and international sources to change their strategy. However, as the movement against apartheid grew stronger, the government began to respond with increasing repression and violence.
The government used a variety of tactics to suppress the movement against apartheid, including the use of police brutality, imprisonment without trial, and censorship of the media. The government also targeted activists and other opponents of apartheid by banning political parties, organizations, and publications, and by arresting and imprisoning their leaders.
Despite these efforts, the movement against apartheid continued to gain momentum, with domestic and international pressure to end the system of segregation and discrimination. In response, the government began to make some concessions, such as allowing limited political participation for non-white citizens and releasing some political prisoners. However, these measures were seen as insufficient by the anti-apartheid movement and the international community, which continued to push for more significant reforms.
As the 1980s progressed, the apartheid government faced increased pressure from economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and an escalating domestic resistance movement. The government responded with increasingly harsh measures, including the use of military force, to suppress dissent and maintain control.
By the early 1990s, the apartheid government realized that the system was unsustainable and began negotiating with anti-apartheid leaders, leading to the eventual dismantling of the apartheid system and the first democratic elections in South Africa in 1994.