If the Canadian government morally revived the Indian Act, there would be several stakeholders who would be directly or indirectly impacted by this ethical dilemma. Some of the individuals and organizations that would be involved or taking sides on this issue include:
1. Indigenous peoples: Indigenous peoples would be the most directly impacted by any revisions to the Indian Act, as it governs their relationships with the Canadian government and their rights to land, resources, and self-determination.
2. Canadian government: The Canadian government would be responsible for making any revisions to the Indian Act, and would need to consider the perspectives and needs of Indigenous peoples, as well as the implications for other stakeholders such as non-Indigenous Canadians and businesses.
3. Non-Indigenous Canadians: Non-Indigenous Canadians would also be impacted by any revisions to the Indian Act, as it could affect their relationships with Indigenous peoples and their access to land and resources.
4. Businesses and industries: Businesses and industries that operate on Indigenous lands or that rely on Indigenous resources would be impacted by any revisions to the Indian Act, as it could affect their legal rights and obligations.
5. Environmental groups: Environmental groups would be impacted by any revisions to the Indian Act that affect Indigenous land and resource rights, as they often advocate for the protection of these lands and resources.
6. Legal and academic communities: Legal and academic communities would be involved in the moral review of the Indian Act, providing expertise and analysis of the implications of any revisions to the Act.
7. International organizations: International organizations that work on Indigenous rights, such as the United Nations, would also be interested in any revisions to the Indian Act, as it could impact Canada's compliance with international human rights standards.