Question

1. First of all, give us your real-life example of ingroup/outgroup people. (For example: My lovely family vs. the horrible next door family that devalues the entire neighborhood; my brother vs. two evil sisters.) What stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination may have been there to perpetuate the divide between you and the other side?

2. Identify at least two types of attributions (Hint: see section 12.2 in Grison & Gazzaniga, 2022, pp. 467-468) that have fueled the conflict between you and the outgroup. Please cite the appropriate terms from the chapter in APA style, briefly explain the definitions, and then connect them with your observations.

Answer 1

In-group and out-group dynamics can lead to stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. The fundamental attribution error and the ultimate attribution error are two types of attributions that fuel the conflict between in-groups and out-groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

In-group and out-group dynamics can be observed in various social contexts. An example of an in-group and out-group situation is when different sports teams compete against each other. Each team represents an in-group for its own players and supporters, while the opposing team becomes the out-group. This can lead to stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination as each group may develop biases and negative attitudes towards the other.

One type of attribution that may fuel the conflict between in-groups and out-groups is the fundamental attribution error. This refers to the tendency to attribute the behavior of others to internal and dispositional factors, while ignoring the role of situational influences. For example, members of an in-group may view the actions of out-group members as reflecting their core characteristics, without considering external factors that may have influenced their behavior.

Another type of attribution that can contribute to the divide between in-groups and out-groups is the ultimate attribution error. This occurs when positive actions performed by in-group members are attributed to internal qualities, while negative actions performed by out-group members are attributed to their group membership. This can further perpetuate stereotypes and discrimination.

Answer 2

Answer: example:

A common real-life case of ingroup/outgroup inclination is between sports fans of equal groups. For occurrence, fans of a soccer group may feel a solid sense of personality and dependability towards their possess group, whereas seeing fans of the match group as portion of an outgroup. Fans may have negative generalizations almost the equal team's fans, such as considering they are rough or unsportsmanlike. This may lead to bias and separation, such as insulting, name-calling, or indeed savagery amid diversions or within the roads.

Attributions:

Two types of attributions that will fuel the strife between match sports teams' fans are:

Journalist Induction Hypothesis: Concurring to this hypothesis, individuals make inductions almost the causes of other people's behavior based on their individual miens, instead of situational variables. When fans of one group witness a fan of the match group locks in in forceful or unsportsmanlike behavior, they may make an internal attribution, accepting that the behavior reflects the other fan's negative identity characteristics, instead of crediting it to situational variables, such as incitement or disappointment.

Crucial Attribution Mistake: This alludes to the propensity to overemphasize dispositional clarifications for others' behavior, whereas thinking little of the affect of situational variables. Fans of one group may quality their claim team's victory to their ability and difficult work, whereas crediting the other team's victory to outside variables, such as good fortune or one-sided officials. Alternately, they may trait their possess team's disappointments to situational components, whereas faulting the other team's predominant ability or deliberateness cheating.

Step-by-step explanation: